Methodology


Black Kite built the study population from a widely used commercial company database.

A company was included when its category metadata identified it as an AI company or referenced AI technologies, including generative AI, machine learning, deep learning, neural networks, natural language processing, computer vision, large language models, AI infrastructure, and chatbots. Each candidate was then reviewed against its business description and public website to confirm that AI is central to its products or services; companies that only use AI incidentally were excluded.

Black Kite assessed the external cybersecurity posture of 18,160 AI companies and examined their primary business activities and geographic distribution.

AI activity was determined through business and technology classifications and a review of company products and services. Activities are presented in six broad groups, with a small unclassified category.

Geographic comparisons use recorded headquarters locations.

Europe is defined geographically and includes the EU-27, the United Kingdom, Switzerland, Norway, and the rest of the continent, excluding Russia and Türkiye. Taiwan is considered separate from China. Company-level findings are reported as percentages, with each company counted once per category. Country and regional percentages refer to the companies within the relevant geographic group; different security categories may overlap.

Company size, founding year, and funding information come from the same company database

used to build the study population; size is available for 86% of companies, founding year for 88%, and disclosed funding for 26%.

Industry comparisons of ransomware susceptibility are based on Black Kite assessments of four reference groups:

632 manufacturing vendors, 735 healthcare vendors, 2,690 IT vendors, and 10,000 finance vendors.

The assessment covers critical vulnerabilities, CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities, email authentication, Botnet Infection, unusual network activity, corporate credentials found in information-stealing malware records, and ransomware susceptibility.

Critical vulnerabilities are identified by matching the observed versions of internet-facing software, operating systems, and network devices against publicly disclosed, critical-severity CVEs. Credential findings include company services and third-party business applications. All assessments were conducted externally, without access to company systems, using only publicly observable information. Unusual network behavior is identified from NetFlow traffic records compared against each company's own historical baseline. Every vulnerability reported here is a potential exposure identified from the outside; the research did not test exploitation, and the findings are not, by themselves, confirmation of a successful attack.

Rapid Reset (CVE-2023-44487) is counted only where a direct check of internet-facing systems confirmed that HTTP/2 was enabled.

MCP results come from a separate dataset of publicly discoverable repositories, packages, and hosted components.

MCP severity percentages describe recorded findings rather than companies. Domain attribution does not establish production deployment, and private MCP environments are outside the analysis. Forbes AI 50 results describe a separate supplementary cohort.

Company security observations draw on Black Kite platform data from September and October 2026. KEV references use CISA’s catalog as of October 8, 2026.

PHP2Shell figures come from a supplementary scan completed in the week after the October 21, 2026 fixes and are based on observed PHP versions on internet-facing systems.

NEXT: Frequently asked questions about AI supply chain risk.

NEXT PAGE